Supademo vs. Rayko:
The interactive AI demo agent

With Supademo, the AI Demo Agent assists buyers and surfaces the right interactive demo while they explore it hands-on. With Rayko, the agent drives the live browser and decides where it goes, so buyers can ask questions but can't take over the navigation.

Book a live demo
Supademo logo
Rayko logo
How the buyer engagesβœ… Chat, voice, interactive🟑 Voice, chat
Interactive demos buyers click throughβœ… Yep⛔️ No
Buyer free to navigate the productβœ… Yes, sandbox demos🟑 No, agent-driven
AI demo agent pricingβœ… ~$0.50–0.80 / convo🟑 Sales-gated
A full demo platform, not just a demo agentβœ… Absolutely⛔️ No
Supademo leads in 0 of 5 shown+7 more below ↓

Trusted by 200,000+ top operators and 3,000+ paying organizations

Explore by
Spare Logo
Beehiiv Logo
Lightspeed Logo
Easy Logo
Bullhorn Logo
RB2B Logo
VRIFY Logo
Jotform Logo
Anvil Logo
Ledger Logo

How does Supademo compare to Rayko?

A side-by-side look at how buyers experience each agent, what each one can build, and how it fits into the rest of your demo stack.

Feature
Supademo
Rayko
Head-to-head as an AI demo agent
How the buyer engagesβœ… Chat, voice, interactive🟑 Voice, chat
Approved contentβœ… Demos, videos, decks, sites, text⛔️ Live product only
Interactive demos buyers click throughβœ… Yes⛔️ No
Buyer free to navigate the productβœ… Yes, curated demos⛔️ No, agent-driven
Buyer steers the conversation: jump back, skip, re-exploreβœ… Yes🟑 Agent controls the path
AI demo agent pricingβœ… ~$0.50–0.80/convo🟑 Sales-gated
Beyond the agent: the full demo platform
A full demo platform, not just a demo agentβœ… Yes⛔️ No
Build your own interactive demos (click-through product tours)βœ… Yes⛔️ No
Record your screen for video demosβœ… Yes⛔️ No
Share demos and track who viewed whatβœ… Yes⛔️ No
AI helps build your demos (voiceover, voice cloning, 50+ languages)βœ… Yes⛔️ No
MCP connector for ChatGPT, Claude, and Geminiβœ… Yes⛔️ No

Why teams choose Supademo's agent over Rayko

Buyers see your product through an AI either way. The difference is whether the buyer clicks through and steers an interactive demo hands-on, or watches while the agent drives the live browser and decides where it goes.

Reason #1

Interactive demos buyers click through, not a passive watch

Supademo surfaces interactive demos the buyer clicks through themselves, so they explore your product hands-on. Rayko has the agent drive a browser while the buyer passively watches.

Explore interactive demos

Supademo

1
2
3
4
5

Click to advance

Rayko

β–Ά

Watch, passive

Interactive = higher completion rates
Reason #2

Explore a sandbox demo freely, not an agent-led browse

Supademo surfaces sandbox demos the buyer explores at their own pace, taking any path, back and forth. With Rayko the agent drives a live browser, so the buyer watches the path it picks, not their own.

Explore sandbox demos

Rayko: agent-led browse

Follows the agent’s path

Supademo: explore freely

Explore any path
Go anywhere, not just where the agent takes you
Reason #3

Efficient by design, on a full platform

Your approved interactive demos load instantly, so you're not paying for live AI to steer a browser through every conversation. A typical Supademo AI Demo Agent conversation averages around $0.50–0.80.

See pricing

Per demo conversation

~$0.50–0.80 avg
vs.
Metered live AI

Runs on

Full demo platform
vs.
Agent only
Reason #4

A full demo platform, not just a demo agent

Rayko is a demo agent and nothing more. Supademo is the platform underneath it: you build interactive demos in many formats, from different sources, and own every one. The AI Demo Agent is just one of the ways those interactive demos reach buyers.

Explore the platform
🌐HTML
πŸ§ͺSandbox
πŸ“ΈScreenshots
🎬Video
πŸ–₯️Desktop
🎨Figma
Supademo: 0/6Rayko: 0/6

What do users say about Supademo (vs. Rayko & others)?

Honest reviews from teams who run Supademo every day for interactive demos and agent-led buyer conversations.

Supademo G2 rating - Rayko comparison

Supademo on G2

4.7/5
#5 fastest-growing out of 125,000+ software productsTrusted by 20,000+ teams across 100+ countries

Why teams choose Supademo for agentic demos

EJ White - Supademo customer testimonial
EJ White
Head of Growth, beehiiv

β€œWe've driven several thousand signups through our demo experience so far. Supademo is a key part of our lead generation strategy at beehiiv.”

Casey O'Brien - Supademo customer testimonial
Casey O'Brien
Solutions Consulting Director

β€œSupademo has completely transformed our early-stage demo motion. Gone are the days of custom demos for unqualified prospects.”

Rocky Shah - Supademo customer testimonial
Rocky Shah
Designer, Robinhood

β€œI use Supademo to easily create interactive and engaging product demos. I love that Supademo lets me add annotations, giving users full context at each step. The AI features for annotations and voice are incredibly valuable.”

Reddit review of Supademo vs. Rayko

β€œSupademo ended up delivering better value because we could build interactive, branching demos quickly and update them in minutes. It worked across marketing, presales, and onboarding, and actually improved demo-ready lead quality for us.”

Should you choose Supademo or Rayko?

It comes down to who holds the wheel. Supademo lets the buyer click through and steer interactive demos on a full platform, while Rayko's agent drives your live product and picks the path for them.

Best for most teams

Choose Supademo

Sales

Qualify inbound buyers 24/7, then hand reps the high-fit ones with a summary of what they asked and the interactive demos they explored

Marketing

Replace dead-end "Book a demo" forms with an always-on agent that greets inbound visitors and surfaces the interactive demo that answers each question

Customer Success

Reuse the same interactive demo library to onboard new users and answer how-to questions on demand

Training

Build interactive walkthroughs once and let the agent guide teams and partners through them

Get a live walkthrough of the AI Demo Agent.

Book a live demo

Best for a specific niche

Choose Rayko only if...

  • You want the agent driving your live product the whole way, so when a buyer asks to see a specific screen or feature, it stays on its own path instead of going there
  • You do not need a full demo platform to build, record, share, and track your own interactive demos

Still deciding between Supademo and Rayko?

Answer 5 quick questions and get a personalized recommendation.

Try Supademo's AI Demo Agent live

Ask it what a buyer would. Based on what you ask, it can surface interactive demos you click through and steer yourself, hands-on, while it guides the conversation.

Supademo AI Demo Agent compared to Rayko

Dig deeper into Supademo vs. Rayko

The Best AI Demo Agent Tools in 2026

The Best AI Demo Agent Tools in 2026

Looking beyond a head-to-head comparison? Our buyer's field guide covers the AI demo agent landscape, across interactivity, cost, and platform depth.

Explore Rayko alternatives

Common questions about Supademo vs. Rayko

How Supademo's AI demo agent compares to Rayko.

Supademo vs. Rayko frequently asked questions

What is Rayko?

Rayko is an AI demo agent that runs on your live production app. Through a cloud browser it navigates the real UI by voice, with no clicking from the buyer, so the agent drives while the buyer watches.

Buyers often weigh it against Supademo's AI Demo Agent, which hands control the other way. They ask by voice or text, get answers in real time, and the agent surfaces interactive demos they click through themselves, plus videos, decks, and slides, self-serve on a full demo platform.

What are the best Rayko alternatives?

Supademo is the top Rayko alternative. Rather than watch an agent drive your live app, buyers click through interactive demos themselves, on a full demo platform with transparent, self-serve pricing. Naoma and Storylane are other agents worth weighing, and our best AI demo agents guide maps the full field.

For most teams it comes down to hands-on control: they pick Supademo when buyers should explore approved interactive demos instead of following an agent down a fixed path.

How much does Rayko cost?

Rayko has no public pricing. It's sales-gated, so you need a quote, and because live AI steers a cloud browser on every conversation, the cost climbs with usage.

Supademo's AI Demo Agent runs about $0.50 to $0.80 per conversation on transparent, published pricing, self-serve from the start, so the spend is predictable on day one.

What is the difference between Supademo and Rayko?

It comes down to control. With Supademo the buyer steers, clicking through interactive demos themselves alongside videos, decks, and slides. With Rayko the agent steers, driving your live app along a fixed path.

A Supademo buyer navigates the product hands-on. A Rayko buyer watches the agent drive and can ask questions, but can't change where it goes.

What can Supademo do that Rayko can't?

Rayko is a buyer-facing agent; Supademo is the full platform behind one. You build interactive demos, record your screen, share them, and track who viewed what.

On top of that sits a creator-side AI suite for voiceovers, voice cloning, and translation in 50+ languages, and buyers click through and steer the interactive demo themselves rather than watching Rayko's agent drive your live app.

Is Rayko safe to run on a production app?

Running on your live production app, Rayko inherits real-product risk. In real time it can misread the UI, take a wrong turn, or hit a bug right in front of a buyer.

Supademo sidesteps that by serving approved, pre-captured interactive demos that can't break or wander off-script. Driving the live app cuts both ways: more real, but less controlled than a demo you signed off on in advance.

Why do teams choose Supademo over Rayko?

If you want a hands-off agent driving your live product, Rayko may suit you better. Supademo is the pick when you'd rather buyers actively explore approved interactive demos than watch an agent drive the live app.

It brings together that buyer-facing AI Demo Agent, a full demo platform, and transparent pricing, all independently audited to SOC 2 Type II.